[GNC-dev] Bugzilla - Resolved Bugs

[Geert Janssens]

Here's what I use as personal guidelines:

* If I was able to reproduce the bug before applying the fix and I no longer 
can after the fix, I mark the issue as resolved. I typically add a message 
that the reporter can reopen the bug if the issue still persists, asking for 
more details in that case.
* If I never managed to reproduce the bug myself, but I think the fix should 
fix it, I will ask the reporter to test.

Note that ideally all non-gui code fixes should be accompanied by a test case 
specifically testing for the particular issue the patch solves. We're not 
there yet, but I bring it up anyway to raise awareness.

Regards,

Geert


Op vrijdag 27 september 2019 13:12:45 CEST schreef Robert Fewell:
> Hi,
> 
> What is the correct way to mark bugs fixed.
> Should I be marking them as RESOLVED/FIXED if I think I have fixed the
> reported bug with appropriate text asking for the reporter to test and
> reopen if not fixed.
> or
> leave it as NEEDINFO with some text asking for the reporter to test and
> update the bug accordingly. Obviously this could mean waiting for the next
> release if they do not want to try a windows nightly / flatpack.
> 
> Regards,
>   Bob
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel