[GNC-dev] [GNC] GnuCash 4.900 Released

[john]

In the case of the Fedora 26 system it won't even let him connect, probably because it doesn't have TLS 1.3 and Flathub (rightly) refuses to connect.

Fred, there's not enough info on the other failure. AFAIK Flatpak does indeed work only on Linux, but doesn't care about the desktop environment. It installs its own Gnome runtime and all the other needed dependencies.

Regards,
John Ralls


> On Jan 10, 2023, at 6:40 PM, Adrien Monteleone <adrien.monteleone at lusfiber.net> wrote:
> 
> I thought one of the points of Flatpaks were that they didn't require the base system to match the software being installed. If the software needs it, Flatpak will bring it in just for that app. (it won't change the base system to a different DE or WM)
> 
> I could be mistaken of course.
> 
> Regards,
> Adrien
> 
> On 1/10/23 7:28 PM, Fred Tydeman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:02 PM John Ralls <jralls at ceridwen.us> wrote:
>>> The GnuCash development team announces GnuCash 4.900, the first unstable
>>> release leading to GnuCash 5.0.
>>> 
>>> This is an unstable release for testing purposes. Do not use it with
>>> production data! Make a copy of your book to test this release.
>>> .......
>>> GnuCash is also available as a flatpak from Flathub.org. Instructions for
>>> installing and running may be found at
>>> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Flatpak.
>>> 
>> I followed those instructions.  It failed because it appears to require
>> Gnome on Linux.  Correct?
>> I am running a different window manager.
>> On another computer, running Fedora 26 (very old) Linux, I get:
>> Unacceptable TLS certificate.
>> Reinstalling ca-certificates did not help.  I assume it is just too old.
>> Correct?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.