CMake technical debt

[John Ralls]

OK.

Regards,
John Ralls


> On 31 Mar 2025, at 05:17, <russ.gorby at gmail.com> <russ.gorby at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I do have some experience with Cmake. We had a fairly mature cmake system that I helped maintain and develop which built our code base for Linux and Windows (both native compilers) but it's been 2 years since I've done any development so everything is some relearning of course.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Ralls <jralls at ceridwen.us> 
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2025 11:07 AM
> To: russ.gorby at gmail.com
> Cc: gnucash-devel <gnucash-devel at gnucash.org>
> Subject: Re: CMake technical debt
> 
> Not for me. Build system problems are a major pain point so they tend to get attended to.
> 
> That doesn’t mean there aren’t things that could be done better. Do you have a lot of experience with cmake?
> 
> Regards,
> John Ralls
> 
> 
>> On Mar 30, 2025, at 8:33 AM, <russ.gorby at gmail.com> <russ.gorby at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I’m now building successfully all the opaque pieces on windows, and it seems to install and run.
>> I was wanting to get more familiar with the anatomy/topology of the code base.
>> I was thinking of doing something in the CMake realm to gain some familiarity there.
>> Is there anything that is annoying the developers that would be beneficial to fix/change in CMake realm but is not critical path for anything?
>> Thanks.
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-devel mailing list
>> gnucash-devel at gnucash.org
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
> 
> 
>