Issues with the latest GNUcash release
Dave Peticolas
dave@krondo.com
21 Jan 2002 23:18:30 -0800
--=-MxVQKU+P7psb6FaIwEE0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 21:01, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > Dear Gnucash designers,
> > I have used gnucash for the past year. I found the transition from=20
> > Microsoft Money quite easy. Now, I am back to using Microsoft
> > Money-aaargh! =20
> > I DO NOT like your new "double entry" system. I already use the double
> > entry
It's not really new, we just started enforcing it with the GUI.
If you don't use the double-entry system, the reports that gnucash
generates will make little sense.
> > system to track my expenses. I don't need to be forced to do so. I ha=
d=20
> > already set up about 16 different accounts which included utitilies,=20
> > groceries, bills, etc. I feel frustrated with the extra steps built in
> > to=20
> > your latest releases of gnucash. I do not like having a separate
> > account for=20
> > deposits. I have also found NO WAY to include withdrawals from any of
> > the=20
I don't understand what you mean here. By 'separate account for=20
deposits' do you mean accounts for checking, savings, etc?
> > accounts. I need the option to withdraw money from my primary checking=
=20
> > account without the necessity of another step. If you could at least
> > give=20
> > the option to leave a transaction unbalanced, this would be a huge help=
.
If you don't want to track where your money comes & goes to, just
create a 'Miscellaneous' account and use that when you would otherwise
leave it blank.
> > Also, the calendar that pops up when entering a transaction
> > occassionally=20
> > doesn't work right. This is a bug that should be fixed. The calendar
> > will=20
> > pop up, but the numbers don't show up until you move your mouse over
> > them.
This sounds like a problem with your gnome/gtk libs. What version
are you using?
> > I am curious as to why, when I created an income account and then
> > transferred=20
> > the money to my checking account, the deposits still show up as part of
> > my=20
> > assets. This is confusing.
I'm not sure what you mean here either. Money in your checking account
is an asset, so it should show up in your assets summary.
dave
--=-MxVQKU+P7psb6FaIwEE0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQA8TRJG5effKKCmfpIRAioSAJ9kfMle2sk3JaO8mJNc0jvJwoqgmQCgrOIt
xMZKGAf44afMsYCXH3WNl88=
=DCCy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-MxVQKU+P7psb6FaIwEE0--