Budgeting - Let's decide what we want!

[Tripp Lilley]

	[not Matthew Vanacek wrote:]

> > > > I don't want to put a dampener on this, but I think a clearer focus on
> > > > what is to be done is a better approach than for someone to go out and
> > > > start coding what they would like to see.

-1

If each of the groups coded what they wanted, we'd have code for two
different ways of doing things, and could see / feel / fix those ways
until they either came into union or it was obvious that there was no
union to be had. Either way, we'd have code.


	[Darin wrote:]

> > um... yeah... what he said.  (except change the bit about perl into
> > python and you are all set! ;-)

+1. Sadly, there's no legal list-voting modifier greater than +1, so I
can't express just how completely I agree with this statement :)