Reply-to munging [was Re: credits expense account in invoice?]

[Aaron Gaudio]

Yes, I understand the reasoning behind not having the reply-to "munged",
but my opinion is still that the benefits outweigh the risks. (Any
reply-to munging should only add a reply-to, never change a reply-to if
someone has manually filled it out.) I guess I fall into the category
mentioned on the page of those who don't like receiving multiple copies
of an email; though it appears that for at least this list, some
combination of sendmail and procmail is preventing me from receiving
duplicates, so in that sense the problem is solved :)

At any rate, I was just voicing my opinion and that wasn't the main
content of my email anyway; it's up to the list admin to set up the list
however they want. There's no point in continuing this discussion on the
list.

On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 08:17 -0600, Wiggins d Anconia wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> > 
> > BTW, may I suggest that the list admin make the list automatically
> > insert a "Reply-To" header for gnucash-user at lists.gnucash.org?
> 
> http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2002/03/lists.html
> 
> http://danconia.org