Bug squishing questions.

[Ryan Claycamp]

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 at 2354 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
>Ryan Claycamp <ryanc at gemair.com> writes:
>
>> Last night I went through the bugs to see if I could help out.  I'm
>> not a programmer, but would like to give back somehow.  I noticed
>> today that two of them were closed.
>
>Well, I closed a few that were marked "non-reproducible".  That's
>what's supposed to happen.
>

Yeah, the closed remark was meant as "hey, I actually made a
contribution!".

>> Today I thought I'd give it another go and did a search on old version
>> bugs and found one against 1.4.x, #116018
>> <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116018>.  However, the
>> information clearly shows that it is a 1.8.x bug.  Should I report
>> that through Bugzilla or just mention it here to get it reassigned?
>
>This isn't a gnucash bug.  It's a bug in the upstream m4 script(s).
>You should report them to intltool and libtool, respectively.  There
>is nothing that gnucash can do about this.
>

I understand that part.  I was commenting that it shows up as being
against 1.4.x, not 1.8.x.  I was wondering if that needed to be
changed.  If gnucash can't do anything, does the bug need to stay
open?

>> I enjoy GnuCash very much and would like to help what like ways I can.
>
>Thanks.  Tackling the bug reports is EXTREMELY helpful!
>

Want to help to the best of my ability.

Ryan
-- 
Universal statements are never true.