Bug Triage (was Re: scheduled transactions make bad transactions with 1.8.9 ?)

[Steve Romanow]

On Wed, June 23, 2004 9:29 am, Derek Atkins said:
> Right now we don't have a good process in place for marking bugs
> as "reproducible".  We do use the NEEDINFO to mark a bug as,
> well, need more info. :)
>
> I suppose that, once you confirm a bug you can change it from UNCO ->
> NEW to confirm it.
>
> If you need bits I'm sure that Wilddev can help.
>
> -derek
>
> "Steve Romanow" <slestak at cavtel.net> writes:
>
>> I would like to help as well.  How can we id bugs that are in need of
>> this
>> work?  Just entries with no reproduce info, or do you want verification
>> of
>> supplied reproduce info?
>>
>> Volker, we should mark them when we start so we dont duplicate effort.
>>
Would you prefer we start with oldest or newest unconfirmed bugs.  Maybe
each of us should start from different end.