The trouble with double-entry...
TC
tc at emailetc.co.uk
Tue Feb 1 22:56:09 EST 2005
> Let's just agree to disagree.
I don't think we actually do disagree.
You're a fan of double entry; and so am I. And so is Quicken, and Gnucash.
The debate, if there is one, is how the DE is implemented. And let's
face it - even in Gnucash, you don't actually make two entries. The
program does the second one for you. As does Quicken.
The confusion (and, a brief look on Google shows that it is widespread)
comes from two things:
a. Quicken refers to expense and income accounts as "categories"
b. It allows you to enter a null string as a category
But neither break the double-entry-ness. You could call income and
expense accounts "tortoises" and it wouldn't break the paradigm. And
the null string is still a valid token in a computer program. In all
reports, all analysis, all *everything*, the null is treated as the
"Uncategorized" category - sorry, I mean "tortoise", - sorry, that
should be "account". :-)
tc
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list