Advanced portfolio doing weird things after upgrade to 2.0.5

[Oliver Iberien]

On Monday 09 April 2007 13:40, Rob Latham wrote:
> It does seem like splits are the issue here. I gave up and dropped the
> report from 1.8.12 into
> /usr/share/gnucash/guile-modules/gnucash/report/advanced-portfolio.scm
> and get the 1.8.12-style portfolio.

OK, sorry, this was both simpler and more difficult than I thought. 
Unfortunately, when I try this, I get the following error. 

Backtrace:
In unknown file:
   ?: 35* [resolve-module (gnucash report advanced-portfolio)]
   ?: 36  (let ((full-name #)) (let (#) (if already # #)))
    ...
   ?: 37  (begin (if # #) (make-modules-in # full-name))
   ?: 38* (if (or # #) (try-load-module name))
   ?: 39  [try-load-module (gnucash report advanced-portfolio)]
   ?: 40  (or (begin (try-module-linked name)) (try-module-autoload name) ...)
   ?: 41* [try-module-autoload (gnucash report advanced-portfolio)]
   ?: 42  (let* (# # # #) (resolve-module dir-hint-module-name #f) (and # #))
    ...
   ?: 43  (letrec ((load-file #)) (dynamic-wind (lambda () #) (lambda () 
#) ...) ...)
   ?: 44* [dynamic-wind #<procedure #f ()> #<procedure #f ()> #<procedure #f 
()>]
   ?: 45* [#<procedure #f ()>]
   ?: 46* (let ((file #)) (cond (# => #) (# => #)))
   ?: 47  [#<procedure #f 
#> "/usr/local/share/gnome/gnucash/guile-modules/gnucash/r$
   ?: 48  [load-file #<primitive-procedure primitive-load> ...]
   ?: 49* [save-module-excursion #<procedure #f ()>]
   ?: 50  (let (# #) (dynamic-wind # thunk #))
   ?: 51  [dynamic-wind #<procedure #f ()> #<procedure #f ()> #<procedure #f 
()>]
   ?: 52* [#<procedure #f ()>]
   ?: 53* 
[primitive-load "/usr/local/share/gnome/gnucash/guile-modules/gnucash/repo$
   ?: 54* <!DOCTYPE

<unnamed port>: In expression <!DOCTYPE:
<unnamed port>: Unbound variable: <!DOCTYPE