crash running on freebsd-6 (fwd)

[marc at osmium.mv.net]

Hello -

I am trying to run gnucash on a FreeBSD-6.2 system, but am encountering the 
following:

$ gnucash
Backtrace:
In unknown file:
    ?: 49* [save-module-excursion #<procedure #f ()>]
    ?: 50  (let (# #) (dynamic-wind # thunk #))
    ?: 51  [dynamic-wind #<procedure #f ()> #<procedure #f ()> #<procedure #f 
()>]
    ?: 52* [#<procedure #f ()>]
    ?: 53* [primitive-load 
"/usr/local/share/gnucash/guile-modules/gnucash/report/acc$
In /usr/local/share/gnucash/guile-modules/gnucash/report/account-piecharts.scm:
  460: 54* [for-each #<procedure #f (l)> (# # # #)]
In unknown file:
    ?: 55  (if (null? rest) (letrec ((lp #)) (lp list1)) ...)
     ...
    ?: 56  (begin (f (car l)) (lp (cdr l)))
    ?: 57* [#<procedure #f (l)> ("Income Accounts" (income) #t ...)]
In /usr/local/share/gnucash/guile-modules/gnucash/report/account-piecharts.scm:
  462: 58  (let ((tip-and-rev (cddddr l))) (gnc:define-report (quote version) 1 
...))
In /usr/local/share/gnucash/scm/report.scm:
     ...
   92: 59  (let ((report-rec #)) (if (and report-rec #) (let* # #) ...))
   92: 60* [args-to-defn #f (version 1 name ...)]
   81: 61  (let ((report-rec #)) (if (null? args) in-report-rec (let # # #)))
   81: 62* (if in-report-rec in-report-rec (blank-report))
   83: 63  [blank-report]
   65: 64  ((record-constructor <report-template>) #f #f #f #f #f #f #t #f ...)
   65: 65* [rec-constructor #<record-type <report-template>>]
In /usr/local/share/slib/record.scm:
  131: 66* (if (not #) (slib:error # "illegal rtd argument." rtd))
  132: 67  [error record-constructor "illegal rtd argument." ...]
In unknown file:
     ...
    ?: 68  [scm-error misc-error #f ...]

<unnamed port>: In procedure scm-error in expression (scm-error (quote 
misc-error) #f ...):
<unnamed port>: record-constructor "illegal rtd argument." #<record-type 
<report-template>>

I observe this with 2.0.4 and 2.0.2 (the only versions I have tried). I 
configured the system with:

   ./configure --enable-ofx --enable-hbci

Can anyone suggest a way to work around this?

Thanks in advance - Marc