Question about Lots and Capital Gains
Derek Atkins
warlord at MIT.EDU
Fri Apr 4 10:30:06 EDT 2008
"Charles Day" <cedayiv at gmail.com> writes:
> Umm.. I can try, but I didn't do the work so you're testing the memory
> of someone who watched it from the sidelines. IIRC the lot scrubber
> didn't always do the right thing, didn't handle all cases, and also
> IIRC it didn't do the proper thing if you already had manual
> cap-gains splits.
>
> In other words, IIRC, it corrupted your data in strange ways.
>
> OK, thanks. Sounds like an appropriate first step is for someone to just
> test it really well and see what works, what doesn't, and what can be
> approved. -Charles
>
> I meant "improved".
Sounds reasonable. But you would ALSO need to test it in regards to
the business features. ISTR some of the bad interaction was there,
but it's been a while.
I BELIEVE the code is all within an #ifdef (or maybe even a runtime
check). I'd have to go look in the Scrub*.c files to see for sure,
but anyone else could look just as easily. ;)
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list