Problem going from 2.2.0
Scott Castaline
skotchman at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 20:25:52 EDT 2008
Okay just did a direct compare of both systems and the locales are set the
same to "en_US.UTF-8" and the preferences are both the same. IANAP, but
could something be broken in the XML parser? I will also be posting this
issue to the Fedora Forum.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Derek Atkins <warlord at mit.edu> wrote:
> Locale setting as in your computer's locale setting. This is completely
> outside GnuCash. man locale(1)
>
>
> -derek
>
> Quoting Scott Castaline <skotchman at gmail.com>:
>
> locale as in settings within gnucash or is there something in Fedora?
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Derek Atkins <warlord at mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > So what you're saying is that 2.2.0 on F8 gives you the same results
> > > as 2.2.4 on F8, but 2.2.0 on F7 works fine? If that's what you're
> > > saying
> > > then that leads me to believe there's something with your locale.
> > >
> > > -derek
> > >
> > >
> > > Quoting Scott Castaline <skotchman at gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Just got 2.2.0 installed and I'm getting the same thing, but when I
> > > > reboot
> > > > into my Fedora 7 system the file's balance is correct. I'm really
> > > > confused
> > > > now. I don't have a clue as to where to begin looking. I do vaguely
> > > > remember
> > > > something about character coding? Something with the OS itself, does
> > > > that
> > > > make sense?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Derek Atkins <warlord at mit.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please remember to CC gnucash-user on ALL REPLIES using your
> > > > > mailer's Reply-to-List or Reply-All features.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Scott Castaline" <skotchman at gmail.com> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It seems to start around May of 2006. I can't remember any
> > > > > significant
> > > > > event
> > > > > > that may have occurred at that time to have this effect. As I
> > > was
> > > > > explaining
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, what other transactions happened around that time? Check
> > > your
> > > > > data file, too?
> > > > >
> > > > > > to MafiaKing I'm currently having problems sending posts
> > > although I
> > > > > do
> > > > > > regularly receive other posts. I haven't been able to determine
> > > why
> > > > > yet,
> > > > > so I
> > > > > > apologize for being a PITA by sending directly to you rather
> > > than
> > > > > the
> > > > > list. I
> > > > > > have checked the change list on the site and cannot see what is
> > > > > causing
> > > > > the
> > > > > > issue. As I have told Mafia King, I plan to roll back to 2.2.0
> > > and
> > > > > rule
> > > > > out F8
> > > > > > as the problem, then try stepping thru the upgrades to see when
> > > and
> > > > > where it
> > > > > > happens. I will also take a closer look at your suggestions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your first post (that I replied to) made it just fine to the list.
> > > > >
> > > > > > TIA
> > > > >
> > > > > -derek
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Derek Atkins <warlord at mit.edu>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Scott Castaline" <skotchman at gmail.com> writes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I had been running Gnucash 2.2.0 on Fedora 7, I have just
> > > > > installed
> > > > > > Fedora
> > > > > > > 8 and Gnucash 2.2.4. My checking account now shows a
> > > negative
> > > > > balance of
> > > > > > > $12,871.25. I can't seem to see what's missing. It seems
> > > to go
> > > > > back to
> > > > > > 2005.
> > > > > > > When I run Gnucash 2.2.0 on my old system (Dual-Booting
> > > right
> > > > > now)
> > > > > > > everything is correct. What changed between 2.2.0 & 2.2.4?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can look at Trac <http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/> to see
> > > the
> > > > > > history of all the changes made to the 2.2 branch since
> > > 2.2.0
> > > > > > was released. Actually, that's not completely true because
> > > > > > we didn't actually create the 2.2 branch until around 2.2.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But I can't imagine anything that could cause this unless
> > > you
> > > > > > have some garbage in your datafile that 2.2.0 ignored but
> > > 2.2.4
> > > > > > doesn't (or vise-versa). You might want to look for some
> > > errant
> > > > > > transactions in your data file.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As what point does the balance start being off?
> > > > > > Did your locale change? Maybe your data file is in a
> > > > > > different currency and GnuCash is performing a translation
> > > for
> > > > > you?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Good Luck,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > > > > > > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -derek
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media
> > > Laboratory
> > > > > > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board
> > > (SIPB)
> > > > > > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA
> > > N1NWH
> > > > > > warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key
> > > available
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
> > > > > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
> > > > > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
> > > > > warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
> > > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
> > > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
> > > warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
> Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
> URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
> warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
>
>
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list