entry transaction not only at bottom

[Mike or Penny Novack]

>>>I am searching the archives for this list, looking for some of my ideas of
>>>improvement for GC. I've found this email, from some time ago:
>>>
>>>https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2003-November/009076.html
>>>
>>>This is something that really bugs me. Is there any way to ask developers
>>>to
>>>reconsider this design decision? ;)
>>>      
>>>
>>The changes needed to implement this would unfortunately be quite tricky, I
>>suspect. There are so many other important defects in the register that
>>adding this enhancement would be a pretty low priority, I think, assuming it
>>is a good idea at all. (It does sound OK to me.)
>>
>>    
>>
If I understand correctly, what I believe would be wanted here would be 
an option to "defer sort" (till either requested or upon closing the 
account) so that transactions would appear where entered until then. Not 
something I would want myself but I can see how some folks might want 
this. How hard or easy would depend upon how the implemented now.

ROFLOL the behavior is exactly how old fashioned "pen and ink on paper" 
books were kept and that's one of the features I like best about an 
automated system like GnuCash (favorite is of course "autoposting" but 
"put entries into proper date order" comes second -- I am almost never 
doing entry "real time" and receive transaction data out of order almost 
all of the time).

Michael