Password Feature

[Robert Heller]

At Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:24:12 -0500 Ray Little <ray at tangosystems.com> wrote:

> 
> When I'm really concerned about security I don't trust Windows' 
> password.  I use TrueCrypt to encrypt the volumes where my data is 
> located.  Learned the value of this when I found the techs at Best Buy 
> nosing around my PC.
> 
> I guess I'm lazier than most.  But at any rate I'm on my computers too 
> many hours a day and don't want to have to log back in every time I step 
> away for a moment and don't come back as anticipated.  It's just a 
> convenience thing.  I used to use jGnash which had this feature and I 
> got used to it.

Here is a thought question:

Do you lock your car and/or take the key out of the ignition every time
you step away from your car?  Even if it is to just 'run in and grab a
quart of milk' at a convience store?  Why (or Why not)?

Is your computer data any more (or less) important than your car?

And yes, even if you lock your car and take the keys with you a truly
determined theif can still steal your car (and the same is probably
true with your computer data).  Still, locking the car / logging out,
is going to be a perfectly effective protection from 'casual'
'theft'/snooping (eg curious grandkids, random 'guests', etc.).
Getting into the 'habit' of logging out (OR using a passworded
screensaver) is a GOOD thing.  Why more people don't practice it is
unknown to me.

> 
> Ray
> 
> Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:18:43 -0500 Ray Little <ray at rlla.com> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> I disagree with you on the need for a password feature.  First, not 
> >> everyone uses Linux (it would be great if they did but that's another 
> >> argument).
> >>     
> >
> > *EVERY* modern O/S has a passworded login feature.  This includes all
> > NT-based MS-Windows O/Ss (Win2K, WinXP, WinVista) and MacOSX.  Only
> > MS-DOS based MS-Windows (Win 3.11, Win9x, WinME) and Classic MacOS (<=
> > System 9) don't.  Does anyone seriously use these old O/Ss any more?
> >
> >   
> >> In your argument against a built-in password feature you mention how 
> >> you're not sure you could do it well.  However, I'm not under attack by 
> >> the Russians (or the Chinese).  I would like a much smaller measure of 
> >> protection.  I'm using a WinXP system in my office and it would be nice 
> >> to have a little something to keep the curious grandkids or guests at 
> >> bay when I step away from the computer.
> >>     
> >
> > All you need to do is create a proper passworded account under WinXP. 
> > And don't tell the grandkids or guests what that password is.  Create a
> > *separate* account for the grandkids and/or guests.  I know WinXP can
> > do this -- I seen it.  *I* don't know why MS-Windows users don't make
> > use of this feature.  Is it really that hard to set up?  Or is it just
> > that Microsoft (in their infinite wisdom?) make it *too* easy NOT to
> > need to use it?
> >
> >   
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ray
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gnucash-user mailing list
> >> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> >> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> >> -----
> >> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> >> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> >>
> >>                                                                     
> >>     
> >
> >   
> 
>                                                                              

-- 
Robert Heller             -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software        -- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
heller at deepsoft.com       -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/