Budget report with a different format

[David T.]

Phil--
Sorry to take so long to get back; there have been a number of other things that cropped up for me.

One big comment I have is that both the Second and third sets of figures are called "Multiple Periods" which makes comprehension really tough. I see in the scheme file that it appears like the third set was supposed to get "Total", but I could be wrong. "Total" would make this clearer.

I also have trouble seeing the data (and this is a complaint I have with ALL the budget reports); I would love to have some way of putting a vertical bar between the sets of data, so that I could tell which columns fell beneath which headings. But, as I say, that's a complaint I have with all the budget reports.

Otherwise, I think it's a useful report, and I'm going to try using it a little more and see where it takes me.

Thanks,
David

--- On Sun, 12/12/10, Phil Longstaff <plongstaff at rogers.com> wrote:

> From: Phil Longstaff <plongstaff at rogers.com>
> Subject: Re: Budget report with a different format
> To: "David T." <sunfish62 at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "Frank H. Ellenberger" <f.ellenberger at online.de>, "gnucash-user" <gnucash-user at lists.gnucash.org>
> Date: Sunday, December 12, 2010, 11:09 AM
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:45 -0800,
> David T. wrote:
> > Aaaaand, the results are in: using "load" rather than
> "load-from-path" fixed the startup crash.
> > 
> > Now, to look at the report itself!
> > 
> > David
> 
> Any comments on the report?
> 
> Phil
> 
>