Bill splits don't post to expense acct with their own date

[Derek Atkins]

Shane Litherland <litherland-farm at bigpond.com> writes:

> Thanks Derek, actually your long answer (i.e. regarding
> meta-transactions) puts it really clearly. My 'workarounds' of separate
> entries were then the better (correct) approach to achieve my outcome in
> the first place it seems.
>
> A rather left-field thought, but do you reckon there is more 'metadata'
> currently associated with Invoices and Bills than the user/GNUcash can
> make use of? As in, it's been designed, so far, to collect enough info
> to do many more things but that depends on what ideas are implemented
> along the way?

Yes, it collects more data than is currently used.

> Just ask that because I'm a little familiar with the approach that it's
> easier to collect lots of data at the start and decide later to use it,
> than collect less at the start, only to decide later you want more
> data... The former, if that's how this bit of GNUcash is, means new
> ideas can often be implemented with less major changes?
>
> regards,
> shane.

>> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord at MIT.EDU                        PGP key available