print check

[Mike Purnell]

++good

Thanks Dave. Learned a few things from reading your file. One was that 
you could globally declare the font at the beginning. I was doing it 
separately for everything printed on the check. I'm sure that's covered 
in the docs somewhere.

I have found that you better set this up for a specific printer (or 
brand, perhaps) and always use the same printer/printer family. At least 
this is true if you have HP and Epson printers in the stable.

--Mike

Beati pacifici


On 2/9/2012 2:30 AM, Thomas Troesch wrote:
> Hello Dave:
>
> WooHoo!
>
> Sounds like you have something working well.  I think you should consider
> adding your format, along with your directions here, to the comments in
> bugzilla so that someone looking there can find it, use it, and move on to
> better things.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:03 PM, dniezby<daveniezby at yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
>> http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/file/n4371981/3toaPageWindows.chk
>> 3toaPageWindows.chk
>> Here is a check format for those of us on a windows machine and need a
>> three
>> to a page check format without voucher.
>>
>> Just copy this file to your c:\Program Files\gnucash\share\gnucash\checks
>> folder and reopen GnuCash.
>>
>> I've tested this and it works great on three to a sheet laser checks.
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/print-check-tp4368830p4371981.html
>> Sent from the GnuCash - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>