Reverse split transactions

[Helmut Wolff]

1 You go to the ATM for 1000,-    (Bank acc)
2 this is now in Your wallet            (Cash acc)
3 these 1000 are distributed (split transaction) as
3.1 expense 1    400 (acc x)
3.2 expense 2    200 (acc y)
3.3 expense3     400 (acc z)


I want to reverse that to:
1 above
2 above
3 expense 1     400  (acc x)
4 expense 2     200  (acc y)
5 expense 3     400  (acc z)


The reason is, that in any report, if I click on eg. [acc x]
it gives me as result <split transacton>, from pt. 3 above
where here I have to search in it for [acc x], here 400

Or, is there a way to expand spilt transactions in reports ?

TIA


On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 20:53, David T. <sunfish62 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> If you open the split transaction up, all you need to do is move the figures
> from one column to the other.
>
> Or was there something else you were hoping to achieve?
>
> HTH,
> David
>
> ________________________________
> From: Helmut Wolff <vukivuk at gmail.com>
> To: Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com>
> Cc: gnucash-user at lists.gnucash.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:43 AM
> Subject: Re: Reverse split transactions
>
> Eg.                                out          in
> Income                                      1000  split to:
> expenses1                    400
> expenses2                    200
> to net account              400
>
>
> I want to reverse to:
>
> expenses1                      400
> expenses2                      200
> net                                                400
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 16:35, Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 23 February 2012 15:24, Helmut Wolff <vukivuk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Is there a way to do this ?
>>
>> Exactly what do you want to do?  Give an example.
>>
>> Colin
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>
>