GnuCash Android App Support

[Divakar Ramachandran]

On Monday 04 February 2013 07:37 PM, am65 wrote:
> (1) You can just use "Dining" as the name of the account. And regarding
> having accounts in different levels I have not tested this, I have all the
> accounts in the same level.
In the latest version nested accounts can be defined. There is a new
field when defining an acount where the parent account can be specified.

>
> (2) I think it is not possible to import the accounts from GnuCash desktop
> to GnucashMobile. I have not seen that option in GC mobile.
>
> (3) No, I think you don't need to select any account in Gnucash desktop
> before performing the import. That doesn't mean it will import all the
> transactions to the selected account.
>
> (4) That happens to me also. I think this is a problem with the OFX standard
> or its implementation in Gnucash desktop. You have to manually map each
> group of transactions (from the same account in GC mobile) to an account in
> GC desktop.
> Once this is done you will be prompted with a list of the transactions with
> a color background (in the help button you can see the meaning of the
> colours) where some kind of intelligence is applied and GC suggests the
> balancing account for the transaction (that is credit card, cash,...), tells
> you that it suspects this transaction is repeated (???) or asks you to
> manually set the balancing account or the transaction will not be imported.
>
> That's how I understand it works and the way I have been using it.
>
> I hope all these shortcomings will be fixed in the following versions.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-Android-App-Support-tp4659393p4659506.html
> Sent from the GnuCash - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>