Splitting large Gnucash File

[ajay trivedi]

Hi amGava If there is no simple way to split the existing big file, I will probably start a new one next financial year as you suggest.I would however like to split the current file into at least two. The reports do give me the year end numbers even from the big file, but file and report take a longish time to load. ait

> From: amgava at outlook.com
> To: aitrivra at msn.com; gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> Subject: RE: Splitting large Gnucash File
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 16:03:22 -0300
> 
> And if do you start from a new one, using the same account hierarchy sheet,
> regarding balance closure, and using closure values?
> 
> 
> Andre Mateus Gava
> [41] 9958-5750
> amgava at outlook.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnucash-user-bounces+amgava=outlook.com at gnucash.org
> [mailto:gnucash-user-bounces+amgava=outlook.com at gnucash.org] On Behalf Of
> ajay trivedi
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 3:49 PM
> To: gnucash
> Subject: Splitting large Gnucash File
> 
> Hi
> I need to split my personal gnucash file which contains transactions for
> over 10 years into two or more files.It takes too long to load on my netbook
> with windows 7 and 1 Gb RAM running Gnucash 2.4.11I came across a thread in
> this List pointing to a jGnucashLib splitter plug-in for this.I am not a IT
> person, and after downloading and unzipping jGnucashEditor-src-2.0.26 in
> downloads folder, I cannot figure out how to run it and what to run. Could a
> member help me with a step by step procedure to get to the GUI of the
> splitter? I can take it up from then onwards.I realize maybe I should go to
> a jGnucashLib forum - but this is an undocumented Gnucash related problem,
> and I hope its solution here will help other Gnucash users as well.Many
> Thanks.ait  		 	   		  
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.