KMyMoney vs Gnucash
Mike Evans
mikee at saxicola.co.uk
Tue Aug 26 05:03:20 EDT 2014
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:06:08 +0100
Wm <wm+gnc at tarrcity.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Sat, 23 Aug 2014 10:10:53 <20140823101053.657e1652 at saxicola.co.uk> Mike
> Evans <mikee at saxicola.co.uk>
>
> >In the UK the rules for VAT invoices state:
> >"A VAT invoice must show:
> >
> > an invoice number which is unique and follows on from the number
> >of the previous invoice - if you spoil or cancel a serially numbered
> >invoice, you must keep it to show to a VAT officer at your next VAT
> >inspection"
> >
> >Note the "follows on from the number of the previous invoice" part. So
> >it IS a requirement in the UK as far as HMRC are concerned. Do not
> >make them angry, or even slightly annoyed, is my advice.
> >
> >http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/vat/managing/charging/vat-invoices.htm
>
> are you interested in me picking this up in the moderated legal groups,
> Mike?
>
Please do. Point us to whatever groups you post to so we can monitor the discussion.
EU directive:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02006L0112-20130815&rid=2 Section 4, article 226.
One could argue that where it says "required" it's a bit like me saying you need (to be wearing) a tie to get into my club, It's not a "legal" requirement but, you aren't going to get in without (wearing) one. Unlike the exceptions for simplified invoices (article 226b) though, there are no exceptions to the tie rule.
Mike
--
Anti NSA? Use PGP.
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x00CDB13500D7AB53
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list