Housekeeping v archiving

[Mike or Penny Novack]

On 2/10/2015 7:17 PM, Jamestk wrote:
> Hello Mike and thanks for the reply.
>
> The house construction project was really a one off to demonstrate the need
> for archiving.
>
> Whilst you can eliminate old accounts for projects and such like with
> reports, they do however remain visible in the account tree. This makes
> selecting individual accounts with the drop down menu a bit cumbersome
> scrolling to the one you want. Yup, you can use shortcut keys to jump ahead
> but it would be nice to have a cleaner overall structure.
I am unsure of what you are talking about with that "remain visible" and 
"cumbersome scrolling".

Is this just a matter of:
a) Not knowing what controls whether a subtree of accounts is expanded 
or not?
b) Not understanding that you can rename accounts, that you can control 
the collating sequence by choice of name?

In other words, just how obtrusive would this hidden part of the tree be 
if all under a parent with a name like "xarchive" (assuming you have no 
accounts with names beginning y or z) and that not expanded?

Michael