Setting up gnucash to use postgesql back end - close but no cigar ...

[Sébastien de Menten]

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 2:04 PM, John Ralls <jralls at ceridwen.us> wrote:

>
>
> Maybe. It would depend upon what's in a book and what operations are done
> in a session. It would take a lot of work to develop a good set of
> benchmarks to evaluate that. Since you're the one beating the horse to
> death, perhaps you can spend some time working on it.
>
> I did a quick valgrind(callgrind) to profile gnucash on the "open
document" operation.
You can see in the first screenshot  the top "time consuming" functions.
I also filtered on all xacc functions.
Even though it may not be easy to see immediately if the "rational
arithmetic" takes a long time, at first sight, I do not see them coming on
the top.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot from 2015-03-14 15:16:22.png
Type: image/png
Size: 425836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/attachments/20150314/1b35f508/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot from 2015-03-14 15:21:57.png
Type: image/png
Size: 343460 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/attachments/20150314/1b35f508/attachment-0003.png>