GL and reports ignoring transaction

[david.carlson.417@gmail.com]

    Courtney,
As Liz alluded, your 'missing' transaction is more than 30 days old. So it will not appear in the gl unless you change the setting to show older transactions. 
David C
Sent from my LG G Pad 7.0 LTE, an AT&T 4G LTE tablet



------ Original message------From: LizDate: Sun, Feb 14, 2016 10:41 PMTo: gnucash-user at gnucash.org;Subject:Re: GL and reports ignoring transaction
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 23:10:10 -0500Courtney M  wrote:> I have a problem that is new to me in that I've not experienced it> before despite entering many transactions.> > I have three transactions entered in 2015 (1/7/2016, 1/31/2016, and> 2/11/2016) and of those three, the one dated 1/7/2016 does not show> up in the general ledger or the register/transaction reports.  I've> confirmed my start/end dates for the register/transaction reports are> correctly set at 1/1/2016 thru today.  I know the transaction is in> the system because when I go to the Accounts tab and click on the> accounts in which the transaction hits (a payable and an expense), it> shows that side of the entry.  Both the general ledger and the> register/transaction reports show the other two transactions> (1/31/2016 and 2/11/2016).> > I've tried deleting and re-entering the 1/7/2016 transaction multiple> times now, making sure to save each time.  I've also tried existing> out of the program and re-opening.> > So, two questions.  1 - Why is this occurring? and 2 - How do I get> the transaction to show up in the general ledger and> register/transaction reports?> > Thanks!> > > CourtneyCourtneyJust checking....you say 'three transactions in 2015', and give 2016 dates.I don't use the general ledger at all. If a transaction is in the Account and the expense or income report, itis in the database.Liz _______________________________________________gnucash-user mailing listgnucash-user at gnucash.orghttps://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user-----Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.