Account selection lists

[Colin Law]

On 17 November 2016 at 16:33, bernie at ledwick.me.uk <bernie at ledwick.me.uk>
wrote:

> David,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.  It does help a bit,  but takes me back 40
> years to before the mouse was invented.
>


That may be so, but if you know the acct you want it is much faster than
using the mouse.

Colin


>
> ⁣Regards,
>
> Bernie
>
> On 16 Nov 2016, 13:21, at 13:21, "David T." <sunfish62 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Hi Bernie,
> >
> >If you begin typing the tree, it will quickly pare the list down based
> >on your typing. Moreover, if you type the Account Separator character
> >(usually the “:”) it will move to the next level in the hierarchy. So,
> >to get to Expenses:Auto:Fuel, I can type: ex:au:f
> >
> >See if that helps you.
> >
> >David
> >
> >> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Bernie Ledwick <bernie at ledwick.me.uk>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't know if this has been raised before or how difficult it would
> >be to
> >> achieve, but when posting items to accounts, all accounts are listed
> >every
> >> time. This means that, for example if I want to post to an account in
> >the
> >> expenses section, I need to scroll through all the income accounts.
> >Would it
> >> be possible to have an option where the list is presented as a
> >> collapsible/expandable tree? The only closely relevant option I see
> >is to
> >> "Only display leaf account names", which still displays all the
> >accounts.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Bernie
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gnucash-user mailing list
> >> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> >> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> >> -----
> >> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> >> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>