Reply at the top or reply at the bottom?

Colin Law clanlaw at gmail.com
Fri Apr 21 12:18:43 EDT 2017


On 21 April 2017 at 14:15, David Carlson <david.carlson.417 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not have an answer to this question, so I am asking for others' views.
>
> Long ago (before GMail) it was pretty standard to reply to emails at the
> bottom and various email clients like Thunderbird handled threads very
> well, allowing readers to read messages in chronological order.
>
> Now, in GMail, which has an annoying habit of 'hiding' all the text below
> the first white space, a reply at the bottom may not even be visible when
> reading a 'new' reply.

In a browser using gmail and in the Android mail client you just have
to click on the three dots to reply inline, and insert replies at the
appropriate points.

>
> To make matters worse, the Android email client sorts in reverse
> chronological order so the newest is at the top, but if replies are at the
> bottom, it eventually becomes impossible to decipher what order messages
> were posted in.

I don't see any such problem using the google gmail android app. I
don't understand what you mean.

Colin


More information about the gnucash-user mailing list