population

Christine Maloney cmaloney4 at talktalk.net
Wed Aug 2 06:25:41 EDT 2017


13/01/1899 is the exact date. I have downloaded a later version, 2017 and it
is still doing the same. The date range is amended correctly but the report
still does not show it. 

-----Original Message-----
From: gnucash-user
[mailto:gnucash-user-bounces+cmaloney4=talktalk.net at gnucash.org] On Behalf
Of John Ralls
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 7:26 AM
To: AC <gnucash at acarver.net>
Cc: gnucash-user at gnucash.org
Subject: Re: population


> On Aug 2, 2017, at 2:10 AM, AC <gnucash at acarver.net> wrote:
> 
> On 2017-08-01 08:30, John Ralls wrote:
> 
>> The date range is selected on the general tab of report options. You'll
find a convenient button in the report toolbar for opening that dialog.
>> 
>> 1899 is a weird value. Have you set an accounting period?
>> 
>> 
> Windows uses 1/1/1900 as the first second of its epoch rather than the 
> Unix epoch of 1/1/1970.  The year 1899 will sometimes show up if you 
> feed Windows a zero for epoch seconds (depending on the program it 
> might also display as January 0, 1900 instead of December 31, 1899, 
> Excel does
> this)

Hmm. That's interesting. We don't use the Windows date library at all, so I
don't understand how that could be leaking in to GnuCash, but it's a better
explanation than anything else I can think of.

Christine, what is the *exact* date on the report?

Regards,
John Ralls
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user at gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



More information about the gnucash-user mailing list