population
Christine Maloney
cmaloney4 at talktalk.net
Wed Aug 2 06:25:41 EDT 2017
13/01/1899 is the exact date. I have downloaded a later version, 2017 and it
is still doing the same. The date range is amended correctly but the report
still does not show it.
-----Original Message-----
From: gnucash-user
[mailto:gnucash-user-bounces+cmaloney4=talktalk.net at gnucash.org] On Behalf
Of John Ralls
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 7:26 AM
To: AC <gnucash at acarver.net>
Cc: gnucash-user at gnucash.org
Subject: Re: population
> On Aug 2, 2017, at 2:10 AM, AC <gnucash at acarver.net> wrote:
>
> On 2017-08-01 08:30, John Ralls wrote:
>
>> The date range is selected on the general tab of report options. You'll
find a convenient button in the report toolbar for opening that dialog.
>>
>> 1899 is a weird value. Have you set an accounting period?
>>
>>
> Windows uses 1/1/1900 as the first second of its epoch rather than the
> Unix epoch of 1/1/1970. The year 1899 will sometimes show up if you
> feed Windows a zero for epoch seconds (depending on the program it
> might also display as January 0, 1900 instead of December 31, 1899,
> Excel does
> this)
Hmm. That's interesting. We don't use the Windows date library at all, so I
don't understand how that could be leaking in to GnuCash, but it's a better
explanation than anything else I can think of.
Christine, what is the *exact* date on the report?
Regards,
John Ralls
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user at gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list