Suggestion

[David Carlson]

For me the time to move, decrypt, and decompress the data file and generate
the register views and report views is so much longer than loading the
program that I do not even try to measure that part.

David C

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Greg Feneis <mfeneis at gmail.com> wrote:

> Also FWIW, I just started GnuCash V...16 (not quite the latest) on my 6
> year old Win 7 laptop and it only took 25 Seconds to get to where it begins
> loading the data file.  While a lot of my programs take between 2 and 5
> seconds to load, I do have a few that take quite a bit longer to load than
> GnuCash does (programing, simulation, cad environments, etc.).
> ​
> Are other folks having a significantly longer wait than 25 Seconds for
> GnuCash to go from start to begin loading of data file?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Greg Feneis
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:50 PM, aegross <aegross at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>
> > On zondag 6 augustus 2017 16:46:24 CEST Sam McCoy wrote:
> > >    Gentlemen:
> > >
> > >    I have noticed the time it takes to load all the modules when
> starting
> > >    up Gnu Cash.
> >
> > FWIW, I have anecdotally noticed that by far the longest module required
> to
> > load is Finance::Quote, which strictly speaking, is not GnuCash code.
> >
> > Regards,
> > AEG
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.
> > nabble.com/Suggestion-tp4693076p4693081.html
> > Sent from the GnuCash - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-user mailing list
> > gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> > -----
> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>