Help on US Tax Form 8825

[Greg Feneis]

Let's wait and see if we can get one of the developers (who are volunteers)
to respond to this issue on this email list.

Then, perhaps they'll ask you to file a bug report.  In which case, fixing
this issue will get in the queue of fixes to be made.  😉

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Edoardo Tirtarahardja <
eTirta.2Reg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thx for the response, but that doesn't really help me. My goal is to have
> this to be included. I'm not familiar how to open a ticket to GNU Cash
> developer to have this fixed.
>
> On 2017-08-09 12:18, David Carlson wrote:
> > It is curious that this form is not in the list.  For tax related
> accounts
> > that cannot be assigned to the proper form you could just mark the
> account
> > as tax related without the form assignment, and it will be in the report
> > where you will at least be reminded to include it in your filing.
> >
> > David C
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Edoardo Tirtarahardja
> > <eTirta.2Reg at gmail.com <mailto:eTirta.2Reg at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Why GNU Cash can't classify an expenses to be reported in US Federal
> Tax
> >     From 8825 Line 14 (Depreciation)? TurboTax shows that the annual
> >     depreciation shall be reported in this line, but I can't set the Tax
> >     Report Option as that line is not available.
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     gnucash-user mailing list
> >     gnucash-user at gnucash.org <mailto:gnucash-user at gnucash.org>
> >     https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> >     <https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user>
> >     -----
> >     Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> >     You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>