Coredump after openSuSE upgrade

[Dan Rawson]

Ralph -

That's actually where I started this journey :-)  I upgraded from OpenSuSE LEAP 42.2 to 
42.3 (with the GNOME repo disabled); this resulted in installing 2.6.16-4.1.  When I tried 
to start gnucash it crashed per my original message.  Then I tried the GNOME repo 2.6.18 
AND a local build of 2.6.18 with the same results.

But I'm willing to try it again - particularly with John's comments about the gcm file.

Dan

On 12/14/2017 02:09 PM, listreader wrote:
> Hello Dan.
>
> The gnome repository is not part of the "official release" distro for
> 42.3. You could try this, nothing to lose except maybe some time:
> Uninstall the 2.6.16-98.1 version. Uninstall any other version of
> GnuCash you currently have installed, regardless of where you got it
> from. Now install/reinstall 2.6.16-4.1 from either your original media
> or from the Main Repository (OSS) and NOT from the gnome repository
> i.e. "http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/42.3/repo/oss/"
>
> Ralph
>
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:13:24 -0500
> Dan Rawson <drawson1 at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> It's out of the GNOME repository on opensuse.org:
>>
>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME:/Apps/openSUSE_Leap_42.3/
>>
>> For me, both versions crash when I try to run a report from my
>> primary data file
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On 12/14/2017 12:24 PM, listreader wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/13/2017 01:54 PM, Dan Rawson wrote:
>>>>>>> I upgraded OpenSuSE (just a point release), but kept gnucash at
>>>>>>> the same version.  This is part of the distro - it's gnucash
>>>>>>> 2.6.16-98.1.
>>> Just another openSUSE and GnuCash user here but where did you get
>>> 2.6.16-98.1?  I think I'm up to date with version 2.6.16-4.1 and it
>>> runs perfectly fine on 42.3. Or are you running Tumbleweed and not
>>> Leap?
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>