Gnucash file is getting long!
Colin Law
clanlaw at gmail.com
Sat Jun 17 03:07:49 EDT 2017
On 17 June 2017 at 02:31, AC <gnucash at acarver.net> wrote:
> On 2017-06-16 09:35, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Adam Funk <a24061 at ducksburg.com> writes:
>>
>>>> Not necessarily. The "default" backend would be SQLite, which is a DB
>>>> that stores into a single file. So it will act like the current XML
>>>> backend in terms of storage, but not necessarily the same with backup
>>>> files. However no server is required.
>>>
>>> Great! Thanks to you & Colin for that information.
>>
>> Also keep in mind that the mysql data isn't compressed, so your disk
>> space usage will grow significantly when using a SQL backend vs the
>> (compressed) XML.
>>
>
> You can enable compression in MySQL 5.5. This applies to InnoDB table
> types using a file per table and the Barracuda file format. This
> configuration must be enabled before the tables are created.
Given the small size (in MySQL terms) of a GC database and the complex
nature of some of the queries I suggest we would be better to accept a
larger database and (presumably) quicker access. Though I suppose if
the db indices are arranged appropriately the overhead may be small.
Colin
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list