simple find transactions report

[Elmar]

Perfect!  Thanks, although I had to translate this to the menu entry 
"edit/find" (not "search")

- elmar

On 10/09/2017 04:16 PM, David Carlson wrote:
> Geert,
>
> Gmail used those ****ing triple dots to hide your reply in my mail 
> folder.  Lucky for me I suspected as much when there appeared to be no 
> reply .
>
> David C
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Geert Janssens 
> <geert.gnucash at kobaltwit.be <mailto:geert.gnucash at kobaltwit.be>> wrote:
>
>     Start with a search from the account hierarchy page and then open
>     an account report on the search results tab.
>
>     Regards,
>     Geert
>
>     Elmar <etschme at gmail.com <mailto:etschme at gmail.com>> schreef op 9
>     oktober 2017 20:35:06 GMT+01:00:
>     >Good afternoon to the list
>     >
>     >I seem to be having a brain fart.  I am trying to retrieve all the
>     >transactions (all dates) with a certain payee in the description
>     field,
>     >
>     >and only those transactions.  Somehow I cannot make the transaction
>     >report do this - what am I missing?  It should be easy, which
>     tells me
>     >I'm at fault.
>     >
>     >- Elmar
>     >
>     >
>     >_______________________________________________
>     >gnucash-user mailing list
>     >gnucash-user at gnucash.org <mailto:gnucash-user at gnucash.org>
>     >https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>     <https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user>
>     >-----
>     >Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>     >You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>
>     Sent from my smartphone. Please excuse my brevity.
>     _______________________________________________
>     gnucash-user mailing list
>     gnucash-user at gnucash.org <mailto:gnucash-user at gnucash.org>
>     https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>     <https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user>
>     -----
>     Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>     You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>
>