[GNC] fixed field width

[Colin Law]

I can see this being useful on some accounts, but it would need to be optional.

Colin

On 8 April 2018 at 05:14, David Carlson <david.carlson.417 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dennis,
>
> It may look like there is a lot of  room on your display, but a lot of
> users still have rather low res displays or they (like me) just like to use
> strings containing more than 80 characters.  Two line mode is specifically
> designed to show the notes field, so to move the notes to the first line
> would render the second line useless.
>
> I doubt that you would find very many users that would want to shrink the
> description and notes both to half their size to squeeze them into one line.
>
> David C
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Dennis West <dcwest01 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering if any of the developers would consider adding the "Notes"
>> field to the single line display.  I much prefer the single line display
>> but hate to give up the Notes field.  As you can see from the attachment,
>> the Description field takes up way more than is necessary and there is
>> plenty of room to add the Notes field.
>>
>> Thanks for all you hard work.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
>> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.