[GNC] Reports with previous year in different Accounts

[Adrien Monteleone]

Not sure what you mean by ’saved reports’.

There is a place to save report configurations. That is per user, not per book as far as I’m aware.

If you want to run a report, say an Income Statement or P&L for each year and store the result, then run the report, and ‘print to file’ or use the Export to pdf function. You can store a copy of each report with the respective book if you like.

If you aren’t using the ‘close books’ function, you can run reports at any time for any period, no need to ’save’ them unless you really want to.

Regards,
Adrien

> On Sep 29, 2018, at 4:25 AM, <davidbrown.rdps at photos.bozeat.biz> <davidbrown.rdps at photos.bozeat.biz> wrote:
> 
> Sat 29 September
> 
> I have set up two Accounts of different organisations, both accessed from the same Programme location at 
> "C:\Program Files (x86)\gnucash\bin\gnucash.exe" ...
> The files themselves are stored in different locations in their respective folder relating to that organisation.
> 
> However I notice that when reports are Saved for one master file, they also appear in the list of the other file.  They are saved in the Application location rather than being saved separately "attached" to each organisation file.  I have installed a GNU.exe on a separate laptop and obviously that doesn't happen.
> 
> It seems a bit odd to have reports of one set of accounts, being viewed in the list of another?
> 
> Is there a specific way of dealing with this or are all bundled together by default?  The list of saved reports from year to year just gets longer.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> David
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>