[GNC] Scheduled Trans shows completed 5/8 but not in register?

[Jack Slater]

the correct expense account.

On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:52 AM Colin Law <clanlaw at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 16:48, Jack Slater <theilliniguy at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It DOES show up on the "other side"! How would that happen and what is
> the
> > correct way to fix it?
>
> When looking at the other side what account is it referencing on *its*
>  other side if you see what I mean.
>
> Colin
>
> >
> > Version 3.5 - Build of 3/30/19
> >
> > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 3:15 PM Maf. King <maf at chilwell.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Saturday, 18 May 2019 20:12:02 BST David Carlson wrote:
> > > > Yes, it would be useful to know if you are using release 3.5 or
> close.
> > > > Also, if you recall any unusual circumstance during or immediately
> after
> > > > that SX session.
> > > >
> > > > I think the only work-around would be to find the previous
> transaction
> > > > entry and copy it or force another entry by adjusting the SX
> settings.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:47 PM Jack Slater <theilliniguy at gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I closed both register window and GC but scheduled transaction
> (showing
> > > > > last occur 5/8) is not found.  Must be a bug! Anything else I can
> tell
> > > > > you?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Does the missing txn show up on the "other side" account eg expenses
> > > rather
> > > than the eg. bank account?
> > >
> > > Otherwise, as David suggests, you might have to re-create it manually.
> > >
> > > Odd.
> > > Maf.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnucash-user mailing list
> > gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> > -----
> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>