[GNC] v3.8: Budget "total" field

Adrien Monteleone adrien.monteleone at lusfiber.net
Thu Jan 2 20:00:57 EST 2020


I haven’t yet delved into my 2020 budget, but certainly, the lack of an overall total should be restored as it is critical to the budgeting process.

I consider this a regression of sorts. (in terms of reduced functionality, not necessarily, the return of a previously solved bug)

Was this an accident? Oversight? Intentional design?

Regards,
Adrien

> On Jan 2, 2020 w1d2, at 3:43 PM, Greg W <allrightname at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In the most recent release this change was made:
> 
> [gnc-budget-view.c] totals - 5 fundamental types
> previous showed income/expense/transfers/totals budget totals, of uncertain
> meaning. now shows income/expense/asset/liability/equity budget totals. The
> 5 lines also become sensitive to the global sign-reverse property.
> 
> That change removed the "total" row from budgets making it very hard to
> ensure that budgets are balanced or that there are no unallocated funds.
> Example of the old behavior:
> 
> Income: 100
> Expenses: 30
> Liabilities: 20
> Assets: 10
> Total: 40
> 
> Using that total row I could tell there were 40 units that needed allocated
> somewhere. How can I accomplish this given the recent changes? If I make a
> change and accidentally allocate 1000 to Assets in the new version it just
> updates the assets total row and doesn't otherwise indicate the budget is
> out of balance.
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg



More information about the gnucash-user mailing list