[GNC] Bitcoin is legal currency in El Salvador - why not add BTC?

[Colin Arndt]

I see those ? marks all the time, it’s not just you. 

I'd guess the mailman system either doesn’t support characters in your message… or my Mac doesn’t support what mailman is generating. The fact that I get messages as digests could have something to do with it too.

> On Dec 10, 2021, at 1:21 PM, gcul209 at mynym.us wrote:
> 
> No big deal, I have the same problem in person, but agree text can make it worse.  Any clue where those question marks in the quote of my e-mail are coming from?  I didn't type them and don't see them in my sent message, but they certainly make it look disingenuous.
> 
> On 12/10/21 4:08 PM, Colin Arndt wrote:
>> Hi Dustin,
>> 
>> Allow me to apologize as well, if I misread your message as being harsher than it was. It’s easy to do that over text and it wouldn’t be my first time. At the very least - I learned what shotgun argumentation is!
>> 
>> I’ll take a crack at that new wiki section soon. 
>> 
>> Thanks everyone,
>> Colin
>> 
>>> On Dec 10, 2021, at 12:28 PM, gnucash-user-request at gnucash.org <mailto:gnucash-user-request at gnucash.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dave & group,
>>> 
>>> In case Colin is correct, allow me to apologize (hopefully not equally 
>>> poorly) for being out of line here and now.? I'm sorry if I seemed 
>>> accusatory or offensive, as that was not my intent.? While I do believe 
>>> that this conversation has run its course, I would like to elaborate a 
>>> bit on my choice of words.? Perhaps ad hominem is not the correct 
>>> definition for the ISO discussion, but I do believe that the number of 
>>> bullet points provided with little-to-nothing to do with currency does 
>>> qualify as shotgun argumentation.? Regardless my intent was to instill 
>>> self-reflection, not recoil.
>>> 
>>> Colin,
>>> 
>>> While I have no official capacity here, I would encourage you to go 
>>> ahead with the wiki contributions if you have relevant access.? After 
>>> all, it is a wiki.
>>> 
>>> Dustin
>>