[GNC] flatpak 4.4 reports anomaly

[Adrien Monteleone]

Thanks Geert, that makes sense.

Regards,
Adrien

On 2/10/21 3:24 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op woensdag 10 februari 2021 06:08:21 CET schreef Adrien Monteleone:
>> Out of curiosity, is there something to explain the numbering scheme for
>> reports? Is there a reason they don't follow the GnuCash version
>> pattern? (we're in version 4.x of GnuCash but reports go in a 2.8 folder)
>>
>> This can get quite confusing when discussing app versions vs. reports.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Adrien
>>
> 
> We normally bump the file version number if we make incompatible changes.
> There was in incompatible change between 2.6 and 3, but not between 2.4 and
> 2.6. So the 2.4 number was kept during the 2.6 series. 2.8 should ideally have
> been named 3, but this version change to the saved-reports file was made at a
> time we still thought we'd release a 2.8 series and was forgotten about when
> we decided to go with 3 instead.
> 
> I don't remember if we did incompatible changes for the 4 series, but I think
> not, hence the version number didn't bump.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Geert