[GNC] No Red negative numbers with gtk-theme enabled

[Glenn Fowler]

Right,

You have to add any overrides. Try:

/* Negative number color */
.gnc-class-negative-numbers {
color: red;
}

This may help as well to tweak other things:

https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/blob/maint/doc/gtk-3.0.css
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GTK3#Cascading_Style_Sheets_.28CSS.29

On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 8:10 PM AC <gnucash at acarver.net> wrote:

> Right, I already have that file for other items but I don't have
> anything in there that's controlling the font color.  That's why I asked
> if there is indeed a CSS class for negative numbers or if that's hard
> coded into Gnucash itself.
>
> On 2022-01-09 17:06, Glenn Fowler wrote:
> > On my Windows 10 machine I had to add "gtk-3.0.css" to
> > ..\AppData\Roaming\GnuCash to override any defaults
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 7:21 PM AC <gnucash at acarver.net> wrote:
> >
> >> As part of trying to get a dark theme for Gnucash I enabled GTK's dark
> >> theme:
> >>
> >> gtk-application-prefer-dark-theme=true
> >>
> >> But with that enabled negative numbers no longer show up in red, they're
> >> all in white.  I don't have any customized CSS that selects for a font
> >> color so it shouldn't be that.
> >>
> >> Is this a CSS accessible property or a direct code-driven property?  If
> >> it's code driven why is it not overriding the theme?
> >>
> >> Where did the GTK themes get stashed on Windows?  I can't find a theme
> >> anywhere in APPDATA (Local or Roaming), and nothing obvious in Program
> >> Files (x86).
> >> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>