[GNC] QFX file for Bank of American business account not invoking Import Matcher

[David Carlson]

If your file already contains a transaction that was previously imported
with the same reference number,  Gnucash does not import it again.

On Wed, May 4, 2022, 9:11 AM David Carlson <david.carlson.417 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Probably, but you do not explain what happens or doesn't happen when you
> click on "Import OFX/QFX"?  Are you able to see the filename and select
> it?  Is there an error message?
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 9:03 AM Peter Wu <peter_cd.cn at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Quote:
>> What is your reasoning to expect THAT (data intended for some sort of
>> bookkeeping that is NOT double entry bookkeeping) to be correct data for
>> gnucash
>>
>> For personal account checking or credit card. It is the same user flow,
>> use the web connect for quicken 2018 or above download a qfx file and
>> everything works fine.
>>
>> I would expect this biz credit to work too. They are from the same
>> institution and UI flow is the same.
>>
>> Somehow the downloaded qfx won’t work. I attached the file in the first
>> email.
>>
>> I used a diff checker to check personal qfx and biz credit card qfx.
>> Inside the file, keys are different.
>>
>> Is it because how gnucash is parsing the file?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Peter
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On May 4, 2022, at 6:47 AM, Michael or Penny Novack <
>> stepbystepfarm at comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > What is your reasoning to expect THAT (data intended for some sort of
>> bookkeeping that is NOT double entry bookkeeping) to be correct data for
>> gnucash
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
>> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>>
>
>
> --
> David Carlson
>