[GNC] Strange error in OFX import

[David Reiser]

I think your problem arises from there being multiple <ACCTID> flags. The main data stream is coming from <CCACCTFROM><ACCTID>8320, but each of the transactions within that account has <CCACCTTO><ACCTID>1425 within the transaction. So each of the transactions is a transfer from one credit card account to another. I’m guessing that the OFX importer is having trouble parsing multi-account transactions.

Multiple accounts within a single QFX/OFX file have always created problems. PNC Bank handled it in a way that gnucash could successfully import, at least for collections of checking and savings accounts. But I don’t have those accounts anymore, and I don’t have any of my downloaded files, so I can’t see how they handled it.
--
Dave Reiser
dbreiser at icloud.com





> On Dec 6, 2023, at 1:47 AM, David Carlson <david.carlson.417 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That bug may be a different symptom of the same problem or it may be a
> different bug altogether.  Interestingly, my file does have the <ACCTID>
> tag.
> 
> I attached my file to that bug report in case it helps with the diagnosis.
> 
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:56 PM john <jralls at ceridwen.us> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 4, 2023, at 18:47, David Carlson <david.carlson.417 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> New to me, anyway.  Using release 4.8 in Linux importing to existing
>> account which worked with a previous import last March with today's import
>> I receive the error message "OFX File '/media...' 2 transactions processed,
>> no transactions to match
>> 
>> Why did it not proceed with the import?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=799109 ?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> John Ralls
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> David Carlson
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.