[GNC] Reply convention

[R Losey]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:51 AM David T. via gnucash-user <
gnucash-user at gnucash.org> wrote:

> That would be *OpenStacks* convention.
>
> By all means, impose their rules here!
> ⁣
> David T.
>
> P.S. The amount of energy expended on this topic is amazing to me--and I
> note that NONE of you Authorities On Email Etiquette bothered to change the
> subject of this thread to reflect the completely new (and ultimately
> fruitless) discussion of a topic that left the barn, died, and was buried
> years ago.
>
> On Jul 17, 2023, 11:37, at 11:37, Paul Feakins <paul at antropy.co.uk> wrote:
> >On 15/07/2023 01:56, R Losey wrote:
> >> Is there really a convention for replies?
> >
> >Indeed there is:
> >https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingListEtiquette#Replies
> >
> >Paul Feakins.
> >
>

This exchange is what I find confusing; Paul replied beneath my post, and
David replied above.

It sounds like the convention is below, so I'll stick with that for the
time being.

I guess this topic got a lot of responses because people feel strongly
enough about it to offer an opinion.

I don't think the rules can be "imposed", but if  there were something in
the header or if there was something in the monthly reminder about the
etiquette of posting, that would be a big help to users that there is a
"right" way to post.

-- 
_________________________________
Richard Losey
rlosey at gmail.com
Micah 6:8