[GNC] Confusing version numbers

[R Losey]

If these are updates, then perhaps instead of 4.1, 4.2... 4.9, 4.10, 4.11,
it would be better to use "u" ('update') and have 4u1, 4u2,... 4u9, 4u10,
4u11.

I tend to keep up with the updates, and use the latest version, but I can
see it being confusing.


On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 9:51 AM David G. Pickett via gnucash-user <
gnucash-user at gnucash.org> wrote:

> It is, generally a military style numbering, so the '.' is not a decimal
> point, more a tab, not an alphanumeric sort but a numeric sort.  One AT&T
> project started their order numbers at 100,000,000 so they were always 9
> digits with 900M headroom.  Maybe we could make the first revision after 4
> as 4.100, so the field is in both numeric and alpha sort order?
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>


-- 
_________________________________
Richard Losey
rlosey at gmail.com
Micah 6:8