[GNC] Help with downloading transactions.
edodd at billiau.net
edodd at billiau.net
Fri Mar 17 16:48:21 EDT 2023
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:49:52 -0400
Michael or Penny Novack <stepbystepfarm at comcast.net> wrote:
> > This is a philosophical point.
> > There is group "M" who always enter every transaction first in their
> > books and then use the bank documents to reconcile
> >
> > and
> >
> > There is group "K" who enter some things and use the bank download
> > to keep their accounts.
> >
> > There are pros and cons to each method. Gnucash allows you to make
> > your own choice.
>
> Well put, but more than a philosophical difference.
>
> The former group is "reconciling", confirming that their records
> match those of the bank. Dealing with an errors or omissions. In my
> personal experience, bank errors though rare do occur. Also rare but
> every now and then, the error or omission at the books side.
>
> The second group is NOT reconciling anything. If the transactions in
> the books came from a download from the bank it WILL match what the
> bank bank statement. So the reconcile process in gnucash meaningless.
> Any errors the bank might have made, say misreading a check, will not
> be detected. We should also note that at any time the balance in the
> books will be larger than the actual balance by the amount of the
> "float" (checks written and sent but not yet cleared)
>
> Michael D Novack
>
>
Neither of us have mentioned fraud detection. The advantage of keeping
your own books and reconciling with the bank is it easier to detect
potentially fraudulent transactions.
Liz
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list