[GNC] accumulate split with import Invoices CSV doesn't work
Adrien Monteleone
adrien.monteleone at lusfiber.net
Mon Jul 8 15:37:00 EDT 2024
Verify that Preferences > Business > General > 'Accumulate splits on
post' is checked.
While you are indicating to do so in the import, the posting code might
be reading the preference and overriding your column.
If the devs intended that column to work the otherway and override the
preference, then yes, I'd say it is a bug.
If you have that preference check, then definitely a bug.
Regards,
Adrien
On 7/8/24 2:53 AM, GNUCash wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I import Invoices using CSV files; created using python.
> When an Invoice has multiple items/lines and accu_split is set as “X” in the CSV file, it doesn’t use the accumulation. The importer recognises the accumulate split column, so everything is in the correct column.
>
> I need to manually unpost and repost that invoice for the accumulate split to function.
>
> See part of a CSV: Order ending with 1114 is 1 Invoice after the import with 3 lines. The X-es for tax do work fine.
>
>
> id date_opened owner_id billing_id notes date desc action account quantity price disc_type disc_how discount taxable tax_included tax_table date_posted due_date account_posted memo_posted accu_splits
> #202111115 2024-06-15 000001 #202111115 Order #202111115 2024-06-15 Order #202111115 Material Income:Revenue 1 100 X X VAT 2024-06-15 2024-06-15 Assets:Debiteuren Order #202111115 X
> #202111114 2024-06-10 000001 #202111114 Order #202111114 2024-06-10 Order #202111114 Material Income:Revenue 2 25
>
> X X VAT 2024-06-10 2024-06-10 Assets:Debiteuren Order #202111114 X
> #202111114 2024-06-10 000001 #202111114 Order #202111114 2024-06-10 Order #202111114 Material Income:Revenue 1 50 X X VAT 2024-06-10 2024-06-10 Assets:Debiteuren Order #202111114 X
> #202111114 2024-06-10 000001 #202111114 Order #202111114 2024-06-10 Order #202111114 Material Income:Revenue 1 150 X X VAT 2024-06-10 2024-06-10 Assets:Debiteuren Order #202111114 X
>
> Thanks for any suggestion, perhaps it is a bug?
More information about the gnucash-user
mailing list