[GNC] column widths

Mon Aug 11 20:21:43 EDT 2025

Yes, thank you for this.
I thought i covered that  'theorem' etc in my previous. 
As here for instance:  "..... If the Description resizes then we don't need to size everything else first......"
And the fact appears to be that it simply doesn't.  Didn't.  And that's what I wrote about.
And in the finish all came good.   Is what I described.
My take on it now is that it is simply 'laggy' as the young gamers say.
Laggy and perhaps even buggy.
So the way to work it is as I finished up doing:  'blunder'  around changing sizes literally 'left and right', i .e. columns each side of Description and not worrying about the increased size of the page which goes beyond the bounds of the screen...    And eventually it'll just pop into place.
And the point is: it is not 'in the FAQ'.  What's in the FAQ does not clearly address the question, does not provide an answer, does not provide a modus operandi that works and does make a claim that 'instanter' is patently false:  that the Description field will resize upon resizing other fields.  It does not.  Not immediately at least,  not  instantly,   not sufficiently soon enough to give the operator an understanding that they can expect this.  Quite the opposite.
The faq does not explain what is happening and does not provide a modus operandi.
regards,
ab

    On Tuesday 12 August 2025 at 09:08:32 am ACST, Stan Brown (using GC 4.14) <stan+gc at fastmail.fm> wrote:  

 Arthur, I'm sorry you're having trouble. With the size of the
Description field, you're far from alone, which is why it's in the FAQ.

It may help you to think of it this way:

Theorem: The width of the description field is the width of the window,
mins the widths of all the other columns.

Corollary: To resize the Description field without affecting anything
else, resize your GnuCash window.

Corollary: If you increase/decrease the width of any other field, the
Description field shrinks/grows by that same amount.

Stan Brown
Tehachapi, CA, USA
https://BrownMath.com

On 2025-08-11 16:06, arthur brogard via gnucash-user wrote:
> Thank you for that.  I should have stated that I'd seen the manual instructions and they don't work for me.To me it appears the whole problem is that the Description does NOT resize to fit.If it did all would be well.The 'instruction' itself contains a contradiction I think.  If the Description resizes then we don't need to size everything else first, as it suggests and the resize Description do we?  Resizing everything else would  be suffice.  Description looking after itself.Or, to put it another way:  rezing Description is as easy as resizing anything else: for whatever you resize leads to an immediate alteration in Description size.But that IS the problem.Such actions do not lead to an alteration in Description size.  Not on my computer,  this (win10) computer.Resizing something else to make it bigger, say,  leads to the overall dimensions of the page being bigger than the screen.Making something smaller leaves one with a column smaller than it should be, than is useful, and now I'm faced with the problems of making it big again.For instance right now.  I have a page that is somewhat larger than the screen - the slider shows perhaps one inch available on the right.I make the overall page smaller using the left of the date column and now I have three inches on the slider.I put it back where it was and attempt to make  more room for the date.  Exaggerate it to four inches for the date.  Does Description shrink to accommodate this?  No. The slider simply shows I have now four inches available on the rights.I want  more room in Transfers?  I expand Transfers using the side away from Description to avoid the uncertainty of its operation and suddenly I've got  more 'hidden space' on the left.  The slider showing room on the left.I go back and reduce that Date I exanded earlier and - suddenly BAM !  It's all okay.That's where it is now  I won't touch it again.How it happened, what the procedure, the rationale is,  I don't know.Best I can come up with is:  fidget and fidget but don't use the bounds of Description and suddenly it will come right when its ready.So all's well that ends well.  That appears to have ended well.    :)
> 
> 
>    On Monday 11 August 2025 at 10:36:22 pm ACST, sunfish62 at yahoo.com <sunfish62 at yahoo.com> wrote:  
>  
>  Specifically: https://www.gnucash.org/docs/v5/C/gnucash-guide/basics-running-gnucash.html#basics-register2
> 
> ⁣David T.
> 
> On Aug 11, 2025, 8:59 AM, at 8:59 AM, sunfish62--- via gnucash-user <gnucash-user at gnucash.org> wrote:
>> This is covered in the Guide.
>>
>> ⁣David T.
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2025, 2:34 AM, at 2:34 AM, arthur brogard via gnucash-user
>> <gnucash-user at gnucash.org> wrote:
>>> On my ledger pages the description column  takes up 75% of the room
>> and
>>> I don't seem to be able to change it.I can move the right border okay
>>> but it just snaps back when I let go.Moving the left border is fine
>> but
>>> that just makes the num field big and pushes everything on the right
>>> off screen...Is it possible to control this..  ?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gnucash-user mailing list
>>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>>> -----
>>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.