[GNC] A question about sub accounts...

[Mike Carney]

Thanks for responding. I figured out what I was doing wrong. The 
hierarchy was an account of type asset, which contained  my cash assets, 
and under that was the stock account. I moved things around by changing 
the parent account, etc such that the top account was an asset account 
representing the brokerage account, and under that I now have an asset 
account for the cash assets and a stock account with my stock assets, 
and now the top brokerage account shows the expected total value.

I just needed to get the hierarchy right. :^)

On 6/5/25 9:46 PM, Ken Farley wrote:
> I don't know how you have your accounts set up, but as far as I know the
> behavior you wish is standard behavior.
> 
> For example, my brokerage account is a sub-account of the Assets
> top-level account. It is type Asset.
> Under that account is a Bank account for the cash balance in my brokerage.
> Also  under the brokerage account is a bunch of investment accounts,
> type Stock, Mutual Fund, etc.
> 
> The Brokerage account shows the total account value which is the sum of
> all the sub-account Cash, Stock, Mutual Fund, etc. accounts.
> 
> If you're not seeing a sum of all your sub-accounts what are you seeing?
> Do all the subs have a value?
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.