[GNC] Gnucash-5.13 don't start: missing clock_gettime32

[Sherlock Holmes]

Hi Jean-Michel,

Most users upgrading to 5.13 on Windows don't appear to have the 
uninstall issue.

As the official release has other issues, I suggest using a recent 
nightly build:

https://code.gnucash.org/builds/win32/stable/?C=M;O=D

Regards,

Sherlock


On 11/14/25 9:07 AM, Jean-Michel Cot wrote:
> Marvelous !
> Thrilled by your suggestion, I just uninstalled the old version, 
> deleted the directory and installed the 5.13: IT WORKS
> gnucash/bin/libstdc++-6.dll,is now dated 10/07/2025
> That's fine, but I'm not the only standard user wanting to upgrade...
>
> thank you !
> Regards
>
> Hi,Sherlock,
> The Gnucash installer, for the 5.13 version, detect and uninstall the 
> existing version.
> I will try to unistall and delete the directory before the 5.13 install.
> Currently, the libstdc++-6.dll in the gnucash5.12 version dir is dated 
> 01/12/2023
> I'll tell you tomorrow
>
> Regards
>
> Signature Jean-Michel Cot,
> 8 rue de Lassun, F64800 Montaut
> Téléphone : +33 5 59 71 95 18
> Mobile :       +33 6 88 97 08 02
> E-mail: jmcot at free.fr ; jean.michel.cot at gmail.com
>
>
> Le 14/11/2025 à 07:34, Sherlock a écrit :
>> Hi Jean-Michel,
>>
>> Have you tried uninstalling GnuCash and deleting the C:\Program Files 
>> (x86)\gnucash folder prior to installing GnuCash 5.13?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sherlock
>>
>> On 11/13/25 2:37 PM, Jean-Michel Cot via gnucash-user wrote:
>>> Installing gnucash-5.13 on a PC W11 I couldn't start. Message: 
>>> missing clock_gettime32 in stdlibc++-6 dll.
>>>
>>> Only way to recover was to re install a previous version. 5.11 or 
>>> 5.12 were re-instalmled and works fine.
>>>
>>> Waiting for a new release of 5-13
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> gnucash-user at gnucash.org
>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>