[GNC] Where is GnuCash 5.12-2 for Intel Mac?

[Adrien Monteleone]

Indeed, it looks like it is misnamed as that is the date John announced 
the "-2" repackage because an intended fix didn't make it in:

"There’s been a long-standing Gtk problem on Macs with both a Retina and 
a non-Retina monitor where context menus are chopped off on the 
non-Retina monitor. In spite of having a patch to fix that in place in 
time for the GnuCash 5.12 release I found to my dismay that the patch 
hadn’t gotten built into the release bundles. I’ve now built new ones 
and uploaded them to the usual places. The SHA256s are:

f2e174a64c2e5b3499078d2c15cfb6d041d5cc67adac2d2d5f3bf27582304d60 
Gnucash-Arm-5.12-2.dmg
8e3727cf6958a4ee37f1087edc4eebdfcc0f33405d5e581e73063c5822cff00e 
Gnucash-Intel-5.12-2.dmg"

I'm running the "-1" release from 6/28 just fine. If you aren't having 
issues with "-1" or you are not affected by that bug, I wouldn't stress 
over it. Both are essentially the same version otherwise.

Regards,
Adrien

On 9/23/25 9:47 PM, Peter Lamb via gnucash-user wrote:
> The questions about upgrading to 5.12 from 4.11 prompted me to check 
> whether I was on the latest. I saw that the current Mac Intel version 
> was 5.12-2, and I'm running 5.12-1.
> 
> When I clicked on the Apple macOS Intel ≥ 10.13—"High Sierra" link on 
> the GnuCash home page, but I got a popup that says "The "/gnucash 
> (stable)/5...ash-Intel-5.12-2.dmg" file could not be found or is not 
> available. Please select another file."
> 
> That put me in https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnucash/files/, and when 
> I followed the links there to the 5.12 files (https://sourceforge.net/ 
> projects/gnucash/files/gnucash%20%28stable%29/5.12/), there was a link 
> to Gnucash-Arm-5.12-2.dmg, but the only Intel "-2" file there was 
> Gnucash-Intel-5.11-2.dmg.
> 
> The two files Gnucash-Intel-5.11-2.dmg and Gnucash-Arm-5.12-2.dmg had 
> the same date stamp, but it's hard to tell whether the Gnucash- 
> Intel-5.11-2.dmg that was there is the wrong file, or the right file 
> with the wrong name.
> 
> Anyone got any ideas?
> 
> Peter